propaganda press! state sponsored, people powered.

propaganda for the masses. fodder for intelligent asses

Freddie Kissoon is wrong Forbes Burnham’s rule was an abomination - Moses Nagamootoo

with one comment


Dear Editor,

I was tempted after a more recent event has come to pass, to admit that the Kaieteur News columnist, Freddie Kissoon, was almost right - even strangely prophetic: he had interpreted my reconciliation with the PPP’s government and party leadership as an act of political suicide.
Before I could do so, my attention was drawn to an article (April 6, 2008) in which Kissoon named several PPP leaders whom, he claimed, “enjoyed democracy under Burnham’s presidency”.
Kissoon wrote: “No central committee and executive committee member of the present or part PPP were (sic) ever put in jail by Burnham”. Then he named me among others who were “never charged by the police under Mr. Burnham’s watch with even the minor offence of resisting arrest. They were never touched by Burnham’s police.”
freddie kissoon kaieteur news columist That article presented a complex “Kissoon factor” that made him appear so right at one time and so wrong at the next. In relation to me, Kissoon is wrong, dead wrong in his categorical assertion that I have never been charged under Burnham’s watch or touched by Burnham’s police.
For the most part, Burnham’s rule was an abomination. Under his rule, in my callings as political activist and journalist, I was on several occasions arrested, detained, jailed and put on trial. I was beaten, threatened with execution and survived attempts on my life. In the presence of my wife, I narrowly escaped being kidnapped by Burnham’s police and thugs.
In a nutshell: I was detained and/or jailed at Springlands, No. 51, Whim, Sister’s Village, Blairmont, Fort Wellington, Cove and John, Kitty, La Penitence and Brickdam Police Stations and at Eve Leary CID and Police Headquarters.
I was slapped with politically trumped-up charges ranging from resisting arrests, assaulting police officers, threatening behaviour to unlawful possession of firearm. Not once was I convicted on any of those spurious charges.
Each of those carried its own harrowing details, which I am not going to recount here. A few glimpses of my brush with the Burnham Era would, for now, suffice.
Once, whilst sharing the platform with the revolutionary hero/martyr Dr. Walter Rodney at the Kitty Market Square, a thug threw a bottle of formalin at me. I was knocked into unconsciousness.
I was an active member of the PPP Central/Executive, but in the eyes of the goons and thugs of the regime that status did not attract any enviable privilege.
Walter helped to revive me with cold water, and put me back on stage. When I returned, this time naked to my waist, I told the thugs: “next time you want me off this stage, you have to remove my dead body!”
On another occasion, as I got into the car of Ms. Janet Jagan outside her Bel Air house, a policeman suddenly put a gun to my head. With the gun cocked, he screamed: “don’t move!” I was dragged from Ms. Jagan’s car, pushed into another vehicle, and forced to by knees in the back seat. As the vehicle drove off, one of the men in the vehicle tried to wrest my camera away from me. When I resisted, the policeman with the gun, extinguished his lighted cigarette on my chest.
I was a journalist. My crime? I photographed some suspicious-looking men sitting on a culvert in the vicinity of the home of Dr. Cheddi Jagan, then Leader of the Opposition. I was first held at La Penitence and later taken before Crime Chief, Skip Roberts. He relieved me of the roll of film in my camera, and let me go.
Before that, I was beaten mercilessly by known PNC thugs, dragged between two police horses to the Kitty Station, and then hauled away in handcuffs. Under cover of darkness I was bundled into a car, blindfolded, and driven off to what I believe was the Le Repentir Cemetery. I was placed between two policemen one of whom was repeatedly enquiring loudly, “is de hole finished yet?” After a while, a voice cackled on the intercom: “bring the prisoner in”. The vehicle turned around and I was taken to the Brickdam lock-ups. I was charged with illegal possession of firearm and some other offences.
Being hooded and blindfolded, reminded me of the time when, years before, I was arrested in West Berbice. I was detained at Fort Wellington, then handcuffed and blindfolded, and placed into a land rover with armed policemen. I was transferred to Georgetown, and held ex-communicado with other comrades for 10 days. At that time I was held under the dreaded National Security Act, and threatened repeatedly with being put away at Sibley Hall.
I recall on another occasion when I was assaulted by a former Chief of Staff of the Guyana Defence Force and threatened with death for writing a Mirror article under the caption, “Army Takeover of Parliament”. A day later, I was attacked by men in soldier’s boots, slashed twice at the base of my head and stabbed with what appeared to be a rusty bayonet. Even as I am writing, I caress the scars, and I remember my life in struggle and what could have been.
This narrative is not going to be complete without reference to the anguish of my wife, my infant kids and my late parents as policemen occasionally raided my home, searching for elusive “arms and ammunition”. When I was traveling abroad, I would routinely be detained and strip-searched by plainclothes policemen at the Timehri airport and relieved of booklets and pamphlets.
I would never be able to know the full effect on my family of what was a prolonged period of state-sponsored terrorism, though I would be forever grateful to them for their courage in withstanding the fear and uncertainty of that period.
Lastly, I recall what was the height of madness during the Burnham era when I was arrested outside Parliament Building on a protest demonstration against the banning of Wheaten flour. I had taken my 4-year-old daughter, Adela (now my legal partner) to the protest. The police arrested her as well, and threw us both in the putrid Brickdam lock-ups, which was already crowded with over a dozen protesters. I remember holding my child in the air, close to the grilled window, so she could get fresh air! Ms. Janet Jagan, accompanied by Attorney and party colleague Ralph Ramkarran, persuaded the police to let my child go.
It wasn’t easy under Burnham, Mr. Kissoon, though I am ready to admit that there was a positive side to what could be termed the “Burnham Era”, the full assessment of which is yet to be made or appreciated.
Freddie Kissoon has attempted to use a subjective test to say that the level of fear, insecurity and reprisal is higher now than it was under Burnham. He is entitled to his views.
But the truth about Burnham’s rule, however unpalatable, must not be scrubbed or erased. Nor must we, in looking at what is today, present a revisionist view of that painful and complex period of Guyana’s history.
For me, I endured those years with dignity with the knowledge that the hurt inflicted on me as well as others with whom I have struggled, was necessary for the eventual freedom of our people. My experiences throughout the Burnham years gave me political character based on respect for fairness, dissent and freedom. Those had formed the major planks of the democratic culture for which we fought, and which we must defend at all times.
I do not consider any of it “personal” to the extent that I would remain forever bitter.
Hopefully, we can put this “era” behind us as an unfortunate political blemish and move our nation forward together, without recrimination for what had been.
Moses V. Nagamootoo

p.s I still owe you guys my full response on the appointment of Carolyn as Minister of Home Affairs. gimme a lil moe time

Written by freddie kissoon

April 15th, 2008 at 12:17 pm


One Response to 'Freddie Kissoon is wrong Forbes Burnham’s rule was an abomination - Moses Nagamootoo'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Freddie Kissoon is wrong Forbes Burnham’s rule was an abomination - Moses Nagamootoo'.

  1. Dear Editor
    I am talking about the man who parted the sea but not the ancient one from the Bible; I mean the one from Guyana who parted the sea twice. The first time was when he did it to allow him to return to Freedom House for the 2006 elections.
    The second occasion was when it allowed him access to the Ocean View Hotel to invite the PPP leadership to his 60th birthday party.
    Moses Nagamootoo has shown his anti-dictatorship balance sheet in a letter in Wednesday’s Kaieteur News (16-04-08) letter column. I wasn’t interested in reading the item because the caption consisted of the usual jazz; “Kissoon you are dead wrong.”
    I wasn’t curious in the least because I felt it was one of those infantile letters that the Office of the President and GINA turn out on a daily basis trying desperately to prove Frederick Kissoon wrong instead of removing the stain of dictatorship fully emblazoned on the fabric of the government.
    The occasion for Moses screaming that “Kissoon you are dead wrong” was because of what I wrote in one of my Sunday columns. I went through a list of PPP leaders at the apex of the organisation and didn’t find any prosecution or persecution of them by the Burnham regime. Moses yelled out in that Wednesday missive of his that I was incorrect because he was victimized, oppressed and brutalized by the Burnham junta.
    I was in two minds as to what to make of his enumeration – the endless times he was victimized. Does Moses know the truth when he sees it? Is it possible that he embellished his recollections?
    It is a harsh thing to say about an anti-dictatorship fighter. But many of our anti-dictatorship activists from the seventies and eighties turned out to be little Burnhams. These little Burnhams are from the PPP and are ruining Guyana.
    I need to remind readers that Moses is a parliamentarian from the party that has produced these mini-Mussolinis. But Moses does have a problem with discerning reality and he does have a tendency to turn facts into fiction and fiction into truths.
    This is the man who told Guyana about the not-so-nice side of the PPP. He spoke about corruption; he accused the President of not speaking the truth on a matter concerning Khemraj Ramjattan.
    Mr. Ramjattan claimed that the President accused him of supplying information to the US Embassy. The President denied it. Moses said he was at the meeting and he corroborated Ramjattan’s version. He wrote letters and articles in the print media lamenting the loss of respect for the Jagan legacy in the PPP Government. Then came the end of Moses Nagamootoo.
    He wrote in the media that at one of the statutory meetings of the executive committee of the PPP, he uttered a statement that perhaps all five-year-old kids who have the West Indian blood in them have mouthed off – “I dun with y’all.” The next thing he knew was that he was written to by the General Secretary of the PPP, Mr. Donald Ramotar, accepting his “resignation” and thanking him for his service to the PPP.
    Now juxtapose this Nagamootoo with the following Nagamootoo. At his 60th birthday party to which was invited all the PPP first and second tier leaders plus others including persons who think that the PPP Government is an elected dictatorship, he told the gathering, as the third speaker after Mrs. Jagan and Mr. Jagdeo, who according to Nagamootoo, were his two major detractors in the PPP, that there was never any disagreement with him and his party and him and the President.
    Commonsense should have told Nagamootoo that there were persons among the audience to whom he spilt his guts when he was ostracized by the Freedom House kings. One close friend of Nagamootoo told me that when he listened to Moses’s delivery he could have fallen through the floor. It was an incredibly deceptive outpouring.
    It was that speech on his birthday that has caused me to be extremely dismissive of Moses Nagamootoo. Should a nation trust such a politician? What has Nagamootoo learnt from over 40 years in politics? All Nagamootoo had to say was that people break up to make up and that he has made up with his party and his party has made up with him. Against this background, should one believe all the items on his list of harassments by the Burnham Government?
    My own feeling is that Moses is correct in the major incidents he described. But in his enumeration lies an important lesson for the Guyanese people.
    Here is an appropriate quote from his letter; “Not once was I convicted on any of these spurious charges.” That statement is going to create a nightmare for Ravi Dev as he continues his Carl Friedrich characteristics of dictatorship.
    After describing for readers the dozens of times he was arrested and put before the courts by the Burnham state machinery, Nagamootoo concluded that; “Not once was I convicted on any of these spurious charges.” How does Nagamootoo feel as a PPP parliamentarian when Mark Benschop addresses him on Benschop’s five years of incarceration on charges that a school boy would not believe?
    This man spent five years in the Camp Street jail on a treason accusation for which the evidence was absolutely non-existent.
    This occurred not under Carl Friedrich’s totalitarian model but by a government directed by the PPP of which Nagamootoo is a parliamentarian. Nagamootoo has to ask the question why Burnham never convicted him but Benschop had to spend five years in jail.
    How does Nagamootoo feel that he had to endure those repressive years under Burnham but look at Guyana today? Does Nagamootoo know that his party’s power in government is protected by dictatorial clauses of the constitution of that very man, Burnham? Has Nagamootoo asked himself where the brave ones who once fought alongside him are today? Shall we recap their tortuous roads too?
    Tacuma Ogunseye spent three years in jail; Moses was never convicted. David Hinds spent three years in jail; Moses was never convicted. Does Moses want to know about the balance-sheet of Rupert Roopnarine? Is it true, Moses, that the subsidy was withdrawn from Critchlow Labour College partly because Dr. Roopnarine was the principal of the institution?
    Donald Rodney almost lost his life when the bomb that killed his brother, Walter, severely injured him. After the PPP came to power in 1992, Donald could not get a single contract as a quantity surveyor. He had to migrate.
    What about me, Moses? While Burnham was happy to employ your comrades in the PPP leadership, I had to suffer an employment ban by Burnham. I will leave out the rest of my balance sheet but I should mention the time I was pushed off a moving UG bus and broke my back.
    David Hinds, Dr. Roopnarine, Tacuma Ogunseye, Donald Rodney and I are still struggling for democracy in Guyana, Moses. I will be in the marches in support of press freedom. I want to travel up to Berbice to show solidarity with the enraged sugar workers. Let me scream out to you Moses: “The struggle continues.”
    Frederick Kissoon

    resist

    21 Apr 08 at 1:00 pm

Leave a Reply

Tags:
Separate individual tags by commas